Contrast of supplier payments in Australia and the United States


B2B payment delays are a universal problem, with businesses around the world feeling the cash pressure from late invoice payments. Yet not all jurisdictions treat the problem the same. This week’s B2B Data Digest examines the latest initiatives in Australia, which include efforts to speed up supplier payments. These initiatives are in stark contrast to large companies in the United States, which continue to practice longer supplier payments.

5% of all sales made on trade credit have been written off as uncollectible, according to a new survey published by Atradius. The report, which surveyed Australian businesses, concluded that B2B payment practices reveal “dramatic” trends. For Australian suppliers, for example, the percentage of write-offs has more than doubled the average of 2% of credit sales written off, which was the average before the pandemic. B2B payment delays have also increased, with 54% of Australian B2B companies reporting their invoices overdue, up from 21% before the pandemic. The construction industry in Australia has been particularly affected, researchers found.

“As businesses seek to grow in these uncertain economic times, it is important that they continue to employ strategic credit management measures such as credit insurance to … [minimize] the risk of default ”, declared Marc Hoppe, general manager of Atradius Oceania. “This will help protect businesses from the increased risk of customer bankruptcy, help them more effectively manage the additional volume of late payments, and also facilitate business growth by helping businesses explore new opportunities, including by granting more credit to existing and new customers, and finding new markets to explore.

7-day payment terms have been put in place for small BHP suppliers, a mining company that operates in Australia, Chile, the United States, Canada, Mexico and Trinidad and Tobago. The organization said the expedited payment terms would begin on July 1 of this year and would apply to local and native vendors as well. The 7-day payment terms follow BHP’s efforts in 2020 to speed up payments to small suppliers in Australia only; previous payment terms were 30 days, reports in Weekly Mining said, adding that BHP spends around $ 2.5 billion annually with small local and native vendors.

20 day payment terms will be required for companies working with the Australian Government of New South Wales, Smart business recently reported. The new rules for government officials are part of efforts to support prompt payments to small suppliers, with the new requirements applying to large companies with government contractors who work with subcontractors. These companies will now have to pay these subcontractors within 20 days and will apply to companies with government contracts worth A $ 7.5 million (approximately $ 5.6 million) and above. “Cash flow can be a major issue for small businesses and the new policy will support the important role small businesses play in the NSW economy,” said the Minister for Small Business and Business. Finances of New South Wales. Damien Tudehope in a report.

Supplier payment terms of 58 days were the average for large U.S. companies for the first quarter of fiscal 2020, according to the the Wall Street newspaper (WSJ), citing data from the Hackett Group. The research, which examined supplier payment practices for fiscal 2020, found that some large companies are taking longer to pay their suppliers despite the ongoing economic recovery. Over the full year, large companies took an average of 62 days to pay their suppliers. Among the large companies that are extending bill payment deadlines are Macy’s, which reports said in its call for results last month that it was benefiting from longer supplier payment terms. The publication also highlighted Mondelez International, which has also seen an increase in cash flow due to longer payments to suppliers.

——————————

PYMNTS DATA: 100 HEALTH DIRECTORS DECLARE USE OF AI TO LIMIT FRAUD, WASTE AND ABUSE

About: Healthcare companies lose 12% of their annual revenue to fraud, waste and abuse (FWA), but few are using artificial intelligence (AI) to solve these problems due to cost concerns. In AI In Focus: Targeting Fraud, Waste and Abuse In Healthcare, PYMNTS surveyed 100 healthcare executives to find out how AI could actually help businesses save money by limiting costly misrepresentation and false positives.


Source link

Previous Leverage firms not yet out of danger of bankruptcy, newspaper warns
Next Alamo Drafthouse files for bankruptcy. How will local theaters be affected?